Can you explain something to me? I heard Paul Ryan at his press conference describe how the new tax code will help America “recover.” And to give an example of how cutting the corporate tax to 20% will bring American businesses back, he used an example from his own state – Wisconsin. He said the biggest company headquartered in Wisconsin used to be Johnson Controls (or something like that), but they’re not there anymore. Instead, they’ve moved their business to Ireland where the tax is something like 12.5%. But when America cuts its tax rate to 20%, the company will come back and build new buildings and hire new workers.
Now I know my mind’s been clouded by all those years of teaching and defending the teaching of critical thinking. But I don’t even need to use critical thinking to figure out that 12.5% is significantly less than 20%. So are the operators and stock holders of Johnson Controls, who moved the company from America because they wanted to go where the tax was lower, just not smart? If that’s not the case, why will they be bringing the company back to America?
Maybe it’s just something about trickle down that I don’t understand.
A Scene from Twelfth Night by William Shakespeare: Act V, Scene i (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The Oxford Dictionaries Web site says the use of the plural third person pronoun as an alternative to the “he or she” construction is actually a throwback to 16th century English and is gaining in popularity and acceptance. But I can’t help it. It sounds ignorant or just plain lazy, especially when editors, whose job is to help writers be precise and effective in their use of the language, are the ones advocating it.
Correctness in the use of language isn’t about blindly following rules. It’s about meaning and clarity. It’s about being understood. Consider this:
If your child wants good grades they need to pay attention in school and study.
Who are they? And exactly how are they going to help my child?
An editor recently told me her company (I could have said their company but chose not to) are moving toward making the use of the plural pronoun part of the house style. When I pointed out that the use of they in the sentence above is open to misinterpretation and gets in the way of effective and efficient communication, her explanation was that the copy editor had pointed out that Shakespeare had used the construction, so it is ok to use it now.
I didn’t really have an answer other than to point out that Shakespeare also used “thou” and “hath,” which didn’t impress the editor very much. But then I got to thinking that citing Shakespeare’s use as a justification for unorthodox constructions could solve some problems a lot of people worry about. Here’s a sampling of Shakespearean constructions you can point to when someone tells you you don’t speak good:
English: banner Shakespeare (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
|If you want to use one part of speech for another (for instance you want to google something) Shakespeare said:
- This day shall gentle his condition. (From Hamlet)
If you want to alter the meaning of an adjective here’s how Shakespeare did it:
- Wherever in your sightless (= invisible) substances. (From Macbeth)
- That is deceivable (= deceptive). (From Twelfth Night)
If you don’t want to bother checking for subject-verb agreement:
- These high wide hills … draws out our miles and makes them wearisome (From Richard II)
If you’re tired of determining whether it’s he or him or it’s who or whom:
- Yes, you may have seen Cassio and she together. (From Othello)
- Pray you, who does the wolf love? (From Coriolanus)
If you’re not sure of how to form the comparative or superlative and it’s just too hard to look it up:
- And his more braver daughter could control thee. (From The Tempest)
- With the most boldest and best hearts of Rome (From Julius Caesar)
If you need to cut insignificant words (such as to or for) to stay within an arbitrary word limit:
- As deep as to the lungs, who does me this? (From Hamlet)
I found these examples — and there’s more to see — at the Shakespeare Resource Center Web site.
Before you check it out, though, why not join the fray below…
Is writing a lost art in this era of twitter and text? When you can make your opinion known by simply dialing a number, if you can critique a performance with a phone call that’s answered by a machine, do we even need to know what a sentence is?